- The study defines CEO dismissals due to ethical lapses as “the removal of the CEO as the result of a scandal or improper conduct by the CEO or other employees.”
- 39% of the 89 CEO ousters in 2018 were due to ethical misconduct, compared to 35% for poor financial performance and 13% for struggles with board members or activist investors.
As Martha Turner of Strategy& told the Washington Post, “There’s a new call for transparency and accountability, especially with issues regarding the #MeToo movement and other indiscretions for which there is increasingly zero tolerance….[There’s more] reluctance for the board to give CEOs the benefit of the doubt.”
In contrast, a recent Deloitte Study of 400 CEOs found that more than half of their organizations lack:
- (a) the ability to analyze events and predict their reputation impact, and
- (b) a plan to acquire new tools to manage reputational risks including crisis response capabilities.
- Develop/sharpen internal communications protocols for early detection of potential unethical conduct in all areas of the organization
- Update crisis communications and reputation management plans to track most the critical issues
- Test the plan regularly with simulations and training across all operating units
- Share crisis plans with the Board of Directors to instill trust that the CEO and Leadership Team understand they hold themselves accountable